Welcome to our newest blog series dedicated to the research we're reading and thinking about.
For our first post in this series, we’re looking at exclusionary disciplinary practices with new eyes as states are submitting their ESSA plans. The Every Student Succeeds Act requires states to discuss how they will help local education agencies reduce their overuse of exclusionary discipline practices. These are actions like suspensions or expulsions that send students out of classrooms. Not only do exclusionary discipline practices negatively affect school climate (something we care a lot about here at Teachstone!), evidence shows that students of color, particularly Black students, are disproportionately on the receiving end.
A recent study of MyTeachingPartner Secondary (MTP-S), however, shows promise in helping teachers reduce their use of disciplinary referrals. Earlier work had shown that middle- and high-school teachers participating in MTP-S coaching for one year eliminated the discipline gap between Black students and their peers for that year. The research team wanted to see if these changes lasted. Would teachers continue these equitable discipline practices? And, if so, what about MTP coaching was helping them do it?
Researchers used a randomized control design (RCT), generally considered to be the “gold standard” in education research, to divide 86 middle- and high-school teachers who volunteered into two groups. The control group continued with their usual professional development, and the intervention group agreed to participate in two years of coaching with MTP-S. Students were racially-ethnically diverse, and approximately 40% qualified for free and reduced-price lunch. Using CLASS to examine different dimensions of quality, data was collected on the classroom environment. Teachers participated in coaching for two years, and researchers tracked whether a student was or wasn’t given a disciplinary referral.
As predicted, in Year 2 of coaching, intervention teachers reduced their use of discipline referrals for all students, and there was no difference in referral rates for Black students and their peers. Then, something really exciting happened. In Year 3, the coaching stopped, but intervention teachers maintained their lower disciplinary referral levels. What’s more, there was still no racial discipline gap. Teachers who weren’t coached had no such change—they continued to disproportionately refer Black students. These changes in teacher behavior held even when controlling for other relevant background characteristics, such as teachers’ race or years of experience and whether or not students came from low-income families.
Researchers also examined CLASS scores to determine which dimensions of quality were associated with these changes in disciplinary practices. They found that Analysis and Inquiry, and, to a lesser extent, Teacher Sensitivity, were related to the likelihood of disciplinary referral. Teachers participating in coaching showed greater improvement in these areas than non-intervention teachers. Among intervention teachers, those who showed the most improvement were less likely to use disciplinary referrals. This corroborates prior research: when students are cognitively challenged and are asked to use meaningful problem-solving skills, they are more engaged and, in turn, perceived as more cooperative.
This study demonstrates the lasting efficacy of the MTP-S coaching program in improving both educational and disciplinary practices. These changes are essential for helping students succeed academically, since existing differences in how Black students and their peers are subjected to exclusionary discipline contribute to the academic opportunity gap. Even though changing teacher attitudes about discipline and educational equity are not the primary aim of MyTeachingPartner, this study shows the potential of using it as a pathway for reducing or eliminating racial disparities in exclusionary discipline.
Check out Teachstone’s MTP Coaching program and learn more about how this intensive professional development can impact the trajectory of all children’s lives, increasing opportunity for students by improving quality and equity in the classroom.
Citation: Gregory, A., Hafen, C.A., Ruzek, E., Mikami, A.Y., Allen, J.P., & Pianta, R.C. (2016). Closing the racial discipline gap in classrooms by changing teacher practice. School Psychology Review, 45(2), 171-191.
A few years into teaching early childhood, I applied to work at a school that does incredible work in the local community. I was thrilled to get an interview but realized very quickly that, even though the environment was supportive and the students were wonderful young people, I was much too intimidated to work there.
As the former Vice President of Education and Program Operations, as well as the Head Start/Early Head Start Program Director, of a large Chicago Agency, I am often asked the question, “How did you get your CLASS scores to rise so much?” Our Pre-K Instructional Support scores rose from a 2.65 to a 3.74 the first year, and from a 3.74 to a 4.17 the second year. It wasn’t an easy process. And it was up to us to show our teachers the importance of teacher-student interactions and slowly introduce how CLASS scores could be used to improve these interactions.
Below are three steps we took to introduce the importance of CLASS and interactions to our teachers and, ultimately, raise our CLASS scores.
When my first child was born, I was 30. I was also married, had a master’s degree, and taught in a district that paid pretty well. During my pregnancy, I learned what to look for in high-quality child care and I thought I knew how to find it. What I didn’t know was that even though my husband and I both worked, we couldn’t afford quality child care.