Welcome to our newest blog series dedicated to the research we're reading and thinking about.
For our first post in this series, we’re looking at exclusionary disciplinary practices with new eyes as states are submitting their ESSA plans. The Every Student Succeeds Act requires states to discuss how they will help local education agencies reduce their overuse of exclusionary discipline practices. These are actions like suspensions or expulsions that send students out of classrooms. Not only do exclusionary discipline practices negatively affect school climate (something we care a lot about here at Teachstone!), evidence shows that students of color, particularly Black students, are disproportionately on the receiving end.
A recent study of MyTeachingPartner Secondary (MTP-S), however, shows promise in helping teachers reduce their use of disciplinary referrals. Earlier work had shown that middle- and high-school teachers participating in MTP-S coaching for one year eliminated the discipline gap between Black students and their peers for that year. The research team wanted to see if these changes lasted. Would teachers continue these equitable discipline practices? And, if so, what about MTP coaching was helping them do it?
Researchers used a randomized control design (RCT), generally considered to be the “gold standard” in education research, to divide 86 middle- and high-school teachers who volunteered into two groups. The control group continued with their usual professional development, and the intervention group agreed to participate in two years of coaching with MTP-S. Students were racially-ethnically diverse, and approximately 40% qualified for free and reduced-price lunch. Using CLASS to examine different dimensions of quality, data was collected on the classroom environment. Teachers participated in coaching for two years, and researchers tracked whether a student was or wasn’t given a disciplinary referral.
As predicted, in Year 2 of coaching, intervention teachers reduced their use of discipline referrals for all students, and there was no difference in referral rates for Black students and their peers. Then, something really exciting happened. In Year 3, the coaching stopped, but intervention teachers maintained their lower disciplinary referral levels. What’s more, there was still no racial discipline gap. Teachers who weren’t coached had no such change—they continued to disproportionately refer Black students. These changes in teacher behavior held even when controlling for other relevant background characteristics, such as teachers’ race or years of experience and whether or not students came from low-income families.
Researchers also examined CLASS scores to determine which dimensions of quality were associated with these changes in disciplinary practices. They found that Analysis and Inquiry, and, to a lesser extent, Teacher Sensitivity, were related to the likelihood of disciplinary referral. Teachers participating in coaching showed greater improvement in these areas than non-intervention teachers. Among intervention teachers, those who showed the most improvement were less likely to use disciplinary referrals. This corroborates prior research: when students are cognitively challenged and are asked to use meaningful problem-solving skills, they are more engaged and, in turn, perceived as more cooperative.
This study demonstrates the lasting efficacy of the MTP-S coaching program in improving both educational and disciplinary practices. These changes are essential for helping students succeed academically, since existing differences in how Black students and their peers are subjected to exclusionary discipline contribute to the academic opportunity gap. Even though changing teacher attitudes about discipline and educational equity are not the primary aim of MyTeachingPartner, this study shows the potential of using it as a pathway for reducing or eliminating racial disparities in exclusionary discipline.
Check out Teachstone’s MTP Coaching program and learn more about how this intensive professional development can impact the trajectory of all children’s lives, increasing opportunity for students by improving quality and equity in the classroom.
Citation: Gregory, A., Hafen, C.A., Ruzek, E., Mikami, A.Y., Allen, J.P., & Pianta, R.C. (2016). Closing the racial discipline gap in classrooms by changing teacher practice. School Psychology Review, 45(2), 171-191.
We’ve been talking about the achievement gap for an awfully long time. We’re all familiar with the term; it’s the disparity in academic achievement between different groups of students. We tend to hear about in relation to white students and students of color, but it can also be used to describe the difference between low-income students and their more advantaged peers.
Since I joined Teachstone as Chief Impact Officer a few months ago, I’ve been thinking and reading a lot about opportunity gaps in education. In a great op-ed from 2013, Prudence Carter and Kevin Welner, co-editors of Closing the Opportunity Gap: What America Must Do to Give Every Child an Even Chance, wrote:
The violence of the past days has reminded us all that we must be vigilant in denouncing hate and speaking out against it. I encourage everyone who cares about our courageous country and experiment in democracy to get out and vote on November 6th! Paraphrasing from an editorial in the Hartford Courant today, the strength of our united character is being put to the test. We must speak up, and no better way to do so than voting or encouraging others to do so. Truly great educators are those who never give up. I am not ready to give up on our country as a land that holds such great promise of freedom and justice for all, beginning with our youngest ones who cannot vote but will live in the world we are creating with every action or inaction.
Take heart! For too long, one of the least heartening perspectives on the federal government budget came from early childhood education advocates, who, year in and year out, felt left out of the political dialogue during budget talks. They were either ignored or, worse, the recipients of unwanted attention as federal spending on education was slashed or level-funded as costs increased. However, during a time when we see much division in our country, especially coming out of Washington, D.C., it actually is a bit –just a bit – encouraging to look at early childhood education programs which are garnering more and more bipartisan support.