"What is contingent responding?" one of our affiliate trainers asked me recently. In case you didn't know, contingent responding is one of the behavioral markers for the frequent conversation indicator in the Language Modeling CLASS dimension. We know this is a question that many have asked, so we thought that it would be a good question to address today.
Webster’s Dictionary defines contingent as something “dependent on or conditioned by something else.” For example, a contract for the purchase of a house may be contingent upon the outcomes of the inspection. If the house has a leaky roof, the contract may become null and void.
So what does this have with conversations teachers have with children? It’s actually quite simple.
A teacher who responds contingently to a child follows the child’s conversational lead. What the teacher says is dependent upon what the child says. The Pre-K CLASS Manual describes contingent responding by noting, “The conversation is engaging for students because the teacher actively listens, contributes relevant responses, and asked related questions” (pg. 79).
Let's take a look at one conversation between a teacher and a child:
Child: “I helped Daddy cook dinner last night.”
Teacher: “ That’s nice. Do you want to know what we are having for lunch today?”
Child: “ I guess so.”
Teacher: “ We are having tacos, corn, and salad. You like tacos, don’t you?”
While we see a brief back-and-forth exchange (a part of frequent conversation), we do not see contingent responding because the teacher does not build on the child’s statement about helping his dad cook dinner. In essence, the conversation becomes null and void because the child has no interest in what they are having for lunch. He wanted to talk about helping his dad cook dinner and the teacher ignored his interest.
Let’s look at a second example:
Child: “I helped Daddy cook dinner last night.”
Teacher: “ You did? That’s great! What did you have?”
Child: “We had spaghetti.”
Teacher: “ Spaghetti. That’s one of your favorites! What did you do to help Daddy?”
Child: “First I helped put the flour and salt in a bowl and then stirred them together with some egg.”
Teacher: “Wow! You made homemade noodles.”
Child: ”Yep. It was fun. I got to squish the dough around with my hands and then I helped Daddy roll the dough flat.”
Teacher: “Oh. You kneaded the dough – that’s the cooking word for squishing dough around. What happened after you and daddy rolled it flat?”
Child: (excitedly) “Daddy got out the machine and he let me turn the handle while the machine cut the dough into noodles!”
Teacher: “That sounds like a lot of fun. I bet your dinner was extra special. I’m so glad you got to do that. I can’t wait to hear what else you and daddy cook for dinner!”
In this example, not only do we see the back-and-forth exchanges that are the hallmark of frequent conversations, but we also see true contingent responding. Each one of the teacher’s responses to the child builds upon what the child said.
Contingent responding is important because it lets the child know that he or she is a valued conversational partner. A child who feels like a valued conversational partner is more likely to both initiate conversations with others, as well as respond to other people’s conversational bids, which will only lead to greater exposure to language.
Contingent responding is one of the three behavioral markers for Language Modeling. As a reminder, each of the behavioral markers is meant to illustrate the types of interactions that an observer might see related to each indicator. An observer may not see all of the behavioral markers for an indicator and that’s perfectly okay. However, if you were curious to know what contingent responding looks like, now you do!
Have more questions about improving your Language Modeling in the classroom? Join the new CLASS Learning Community to share strategies that you can implement today.
As a Certified CLASS Affiliate Trainer, I enjoy reading the discussion posts and responses in the CLASS Learning Community. It gives me further insight into the areas that teachers have questions about, and the responses and techniques that members of the community are sharing with others. Usually I just sit back, read along, and take it all in.
Then recently someone posted, “I'd love some great examples of what Quality of Feedback looks like when you're working with less verbal children. For instance... creating an effective feedback loop off of what a child does more so than what he or she says.”
Many teachers will agree that their first year of teaching can be one of the most grueling, challenging, and stressful experiences for them as they take on the task of educating our youth. In my first year of teaching, I was not familiar with the CLASS tool and its impact in the classroom. I was not aware of the dimensions, indicators, and the tremendous power of interactions. Looking back, I recognize the many ways the CLASS tool was reflected in my classroom, but I also see the value in how familiarity with the CLASS tool could have benefitted my classroom. Although many external forces impacted my role as a high school Spanish teacher, the CLASS tool’s invaluable purpose could have made a profound impact on my first year teaching.
In construction, a scaffold is a temporary structure used by workers to access heights and areas that are hard to get to. This is exactly what educators are doing when they scaffold for students. A student is having a hard time reaching a new height—understanding a concept, answering a question, or completing an activity—and the teacher provides just enough support to allow the student to succeed.