"What is contingent responding?" one of our affiliate trainers asked me recently. In case you didn't know, contingent responding is one of the behavioral markers for the frequent conversation indicator in the Language Modeling CLASS dimension. We know this is a question that many have asked, so we thought that it would be a good question to address today.
Webster’s Dictionary defines contingent as something “dependent on or conditioned by something else.” For example, a contract for the purchase of a house may be contingent upon the outcomes of the inspection. If the house has a leaky roof, the contract may become null and void.
So what does this have with conversations teachers have with children? It’s actually quite simple.
A teacher who responds contingently to a child follows the child’s conversational lead. What the teacher says is dependent upon what the child says. The Pre-K CLASS Manual describes contingent responding by noting, “The conversation is engaging for students because the teacher actively listens, contributes relevant responses, and asked related questions” (pg. 79).
Let's take a look at one conversation between a teacher and a child:
Child: “I helped Daddy cook dinner last night.”
Teacher: “ That’s nice. Do you want to know what we are having for lunch today?”
Child: “ I guess so.”
Teacher: “ We are having tacos, corn, and salad. You like tacos, don’t you?”
While we see a brief back-and-forth exchange (a part of frequent conversation), we do not see contingent responding because the teacher does not build on the child’s statement about helping his dad cook dinner. In essence, the conversation becomes null and void because the child has no interest in what they are having for lunch. He wanted to talk about helping his dad cook dinner and the teacher ignored his interest.
Let’s look at a second example:
Child: “I helped Daddy cook dinner last night.”
Teacher: “ You did? That’s great! What did you have?”
Child: “We had spaghetti.”
Teacher: “ Spaghetti. That’s one of your favorites! What did you do to help Daddy?”
Child: “First I helped put the flour and salt in a bowl and then stirred them together with some egg.”
Teacher: “Wow! You made homemade noodles.”
Child: ”Yep. It was fun. I got to squish the dough around with my hands and then I helped Daddy roll the dough flat.”
Teacher: “Oh. You kneaded the dough – that’s the cooking word for squishing dough around. What happened after you and daddy rolled it flat?”
Child: (excitedly) “Daddy got out the machine and he let me turn the handle while the machine cut the dough into noodles!”
Teacher: “That sounds like a lot of fun. I bet your dinner was extra special. I’m so glad you got to do that. I can’t wait to hear what else you and daddy cook for dinner!”
In this example, not only do we see the back-and-forth exchanges that are the hallmark of frequent conversations, but we also see true contingent responding. Each one of the teacher’s responses to the child builds upon what the child said.
Contingent responding is important because it lets the child know that he or she is a valued conversational partner. A child who feels like a valued conversational partner is more likely to both initiate conversations with others, as well as respond to other people’s conversational bids, which will only lead to greater exposure to language.
Contingent responding is one of the three behavioral markers for Language Modeling. As a reminder, each of the behavioral markers is meant to illustrate the types of interactions that an observer might see related to each indicator. An observer may not see all of the behavioral markers for an indicator and that’s perfectly okay. However, if you were curious to know what contingent responding looks like, now you do!
Have more questions about improving your Language Modeling in the classroom? Join the new CLASS Learning Community to share strategies that you can implement today.
Across the nation, teachers learning about CLASS are asked to narrate their actions and sportscast their children’s experiences in order to support and encourage healthy language development. Hearing this, many teachers may wonder, “Will people think I’m crazy if I start talking to myself in the classroom?”
The answer is no. Self- and parallel talk are beneficial strategies for teachers to engage in because they strengthen language rich environments and enhance vocabulary development, all while supporting effective relationship building between teachers and children.
As the Community Manager with Teachstone, I have been able to talk to many observers, trainers, coaches, and general CLASS lovers. I have found a common thread among these groups: a desire to connect with other CLASS users and put their CLASS knowledge to use.
We often hear from CLASS Observers that are interested in observing more classrooms. Meanwhile, many organizations—particularly smaller organizations or those doing research studies—don’t have Certified CLASS Observers and are in search of observers in their area.
I’m often asked how teachers can improve the quality of their interactions around Instructional Support. That’s good! What’s not “good” is that we can’t just focus on one thing. We should consider how ALL the CLASS dimensions need to be in place in order to really provide effective interactions for Instructional Support.
So, it’s June and you have just wrapped up the year with your students. They have made tremendous progress over the course of the year. The routine of the day flows naturally, the expectations about what is and isn’t appropriate behavior is fairly clear to all of them (and to you), and you leave the school year feeling confident that they are ready for the new challenges that lie ahead. You go into the summer months looking forward to a much needed break, but also looking forward to your new group of students in the fall.